~*~ ADS VISIBLE ON THIS PAGE ARE HACKED IN AND MUST BE REPORTED AS SPAM. ~*~

THIS PAGE IS INCOMPLETE, JUST ROUGHED OUT SO FAR. MORE TO COME.

~*~ ~*~

CONFUSING HISTORY AND LAWS IN THE KINGDOM OF DAVID-ISRAEL-BRITAIN INTRODUCING DYSINFO AND MISINFO Lie Number One is that the United Kingdom has only been in existence since 1603, that it has no basis in religion at all, let alone in the Anglican Communion. Lie Number Two is that Roman- Maritime- Laws of the Sea- Laws of the Admiralty- the UCCode are just as LEGAL and reasonable to utilize for people In Trust situations as they are for people in relations where there is no Trust at work in relationship. Lie Number Three is that it's reasonable to set the two sets of Law against each other in the Bar Association, without every having articulated them as discrete sets. Lie Number Four is that citizens of a nation can be treated as cattle who are not privvy to the two distinct sets of Law, and their contents. Lie Number Five is that Law ought to be so voluminous and complicated a nation best not try to teach its stipulations to citizens directly; but rather requires a professional of legal experts who profiteer on legal predicaments they can create by virtue of their special knowledge. Lie Number Six is the "Bar Association" [Inns of Court] definition of a "person" engaging one of the "experts" is "imbecile," even though barristers and lawyers themselves cannot command all sets of legalisms. Lie Number Seven is that a nation can live by Liberty and Dominion, that sets a profession of Barristers, Lawyers and Legislators against its own peoples. Lie Number Eight is that a "reigning" Monarch has no responsibility to notice any of this treachery, who presumes no responsibility for serving as check-and-balance to restore the boundaries between Law of the Land [Trust and in occupancy] versus Law of the Sea. IN FACTS-- Common Law Justice was established among the bloodlines of Israel Kings by Moses over Mount Horeb after the Exodus from Egyptian slavery, and the Kingdom's operations guaranteed that the outcomes of Law would be win/win or pay/win in disputes and conflicts for and among the peoples themselves; Elitism was not permitted and the King had to abide by the same Laws as everyone else. Common Law, one version of Laws of the Land, have always had the purpose of protecting and restoring balance and justice of citizens and travelers who reside and live and work on the land in relationship in a nation and culture of people, in mutuality. [Eg, the Irish Brehon system is another such legal system In Trust.] Common Law is based on truth telling among people who already know each other. Truth about the stone of scone. But what about a Covenant for the Kingdom in Britain? How did this Royal Family come about it? Did they keep it, lose it, or throw it away? It's not even mentioned in the entire Buckingham Palace web-site. True history of the British Monarchy has been with us all along! [See Davidy, Yair, "THE TRIBES, the Israelite Origins of Western Peoples," 2009(?), Hebron, Israel: Russell-Davis Publishers.] In the Diaspora, the tribal line of Judah set up residence in Ireland. Britain's Monarchy goes back to Tara Ireland beginning in 583BC, to SETTLEMENTS where Tribes of Dan and Judah saw the arrival of the Prophet Jeremiah after Jerusalem's sacking, with King Zephaniah's two daughters, Teah Tephi and Sophia, among Celts and Gaels. Holy-Law-abiding culture according to Holy Law and Brehon Law continued until St. Patrick converted Ireland to CHRISTIANITY and the Royal bloodline moved to Iona Scotland, where and when King Fergus moved the Monarchy and its Lia Fail, about 500AD. And then, when Edward I conquered Scotland he moved the Lia Fail from Scotland to London in 1296AD. I mean, if the Crown is Monarchy over the entire British Isles, then this is its true history--not the current version which places the beginning of the Monarchy in 1603AD.

~*~

Six hundred years after the Kingdom of David came to Britain, JESUS CHRIST established the more Subtle Ethics of the Irish Brehon system of Law--in Judea--when he edited His Father's Holy Common Law to include personal applications and intentions--much as the Irish Brehon System of Law was a PERSONAL legal 'relationships' system characterized by mutual trust and reliability. Moreover, with the Sacrifice of that innocent dissident Jesus ben Joseph in 33CE, the point was made that executing the innocent has no reason and no purpose increating Good and Just outcomes for people. So Jesus in His Teachings omitted capital punishment, just as in Irish Brehon Law there was no capital punishment provision. Jesus had taught, "Give therefore what is Caesar's to Caesar; but what is God's to God," THE OPERATING PRINCIPLE of the Christ--NOT subjection as a vassal-chattel to a ROMAN-STYLED Corporate STATE by impersonal rules, policies, procedures and mechanistic practices as in Maritime Law, which is impersonal and in which there is no mutual expectation of trust. B-U-T-- How did impersonal Maritime Law (favoring Elites) overtake Common Laws OF THE LAND in the British Isles? Here is a Legalist thumbnail history: HOW Maritime Law WON OVER Common Law in Britain A handful of simultaneous elements changed law in the 16th and 17th century from the a customary application of Common Laws of the Land for the peoples of the Land, to Laws of the Sea, of Commerce, of corporate statutes. In the 16th century the Spanish Armada dominated the globe with conquest, and tt the time, Spain was the protector of Rome and Vatican, Spain and Italy serving as single military-political unit. One of the Popes in a Papal Bull declared the Vatican owned every soul on earth. Nobody countered that claim (Annunaki Law). Henry VIII adopted the Protestant Faith to get free of that, formed the church of England to be able to say, "No, they don't own us." Then with the founding of MI5-intell by John Dee with collaboration of the Jesus Society of Jesuits, King James II-VI ordered the British Navy to conquer Spain at sea in battle with the Spanish Armada and destroy Spain's dominance, which he accomplished. Since that occurred at sea under Laws of the Sea, High Maritime Laws obtained, and thereafter, Maritime Laws become dominant over England as well, but Spain lost all claims and rights that they had won, under Laws of the Sea. England could now say, "We've now taken away the ownership of humanity from the Vatican, and we are now ruling the world because we are in command of the Vatican by monetary dictates and commerce Law." Queen Victoria continued in the tradition of exercising sovereign rights of her nation, but foreverafter, under a pretext that Common Laws were still sovereign over the Land, which was no longer the case. Today like the US, the United Kingdom is not a common-laws-of-the-land COVENANT NATION; it's the Dinseyworld of British Commerce and Statute Codes. And Her Majesty is merely its CEO. She threw out her Crown when she signed SIX Lisbon Treaties. ... These facts need to be known. Queen Elizabeth II is not a reigning Monarch. She is a corporate puppet of the United Kingdom Corporation.

OTHER PAGES

Effects of the Windsor Monarchy we witness to --- Click on live link

1. CORONATION VOWS "REIGN" VS. "RULE"


2. DEFAULTED IN ROYAL COVENANT OBLIGATIONS as if nonexistent.


3. THIS PAGE


4. LOOKED AWAY "NOT-SEE"ing EU-HEGEMONY as PREDATION on Peoples.

--PEDOPHILIA, HUMAN-TRAFFICKING & SERIAL WARS, ALL in fact "just bidness," no one accountable for harm.
--DEBT & CLASS BANKRUPTCIES, Bank Usury and investment fraud are running rampant, uncorrected.
--WARS FOR PROFITS & PROPHETS occur FOR POPULATION REDUCTION EN MASSE, genocide & omnicide at work.
--RADIOACTIVE CONTAMINATION. The Crown is a primary processor & marketing agency for reactive and depleted uranium used in fission reactors and armaments in the world.

APPENDICES

5. COMPLAINANT's background and links


6. TAVISTOCK's GOAL to OVERRULE Morality & Civil Ethics
   
   
7. 2000_UNESCO_REDEFINE_FAMILY. UNESCO's "World Core Curriculum" teachings.


8. LAWS OF MARRIAGE & BLOODLINE


9. LOOKING TO THE FUTURE

---------------
FOOTNOTE: Historical summary relayed to me by historian Brian Zadonne in a personal communication.